That might ultimately be betrixaban’s undoing.
Betrixaban outperformed enoxaparin in the study’s overall patient population (an impressive 7,500 patients globally), and in Cohort 2, those with elevated D-dimer (a protein fragment present after a blood clot has developed) or ≥75 years of age. But betrixaban missed in a predefined subset of patients dubbed Cohort 1: high-risk patients with elevated D-dimer levels. The study’s primary endpoint was the relative risk of deep venous thrombosis, non-fatal pulmonary embolism, or venous thromboembolism-related death.
(Corrected to reflect that both the overall population and Cohort 2 achieved a p-value of <0 .05.="" p="">The study called for an efficacy analysis of Cohort 1 first, and required a p-value of 0.05 or less in order to test Cohort 2. The second analysis also required a p-value of 0.05 or less in order to test the overall study population.
Cohort 1 achieved a p-value of 0.054, just shy of the threshold for further analysis of the program. Per protocol, that should have been the end. But Portola went ahead with Cohort 2 and overall analysis anyway. Cohort 2 and the overall study population achieved p-values of 0.029 and 0.006, respectively.
0>
No comments:
Post a Comment